| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Jan | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | ||||||
- Information Technology (75)
- Thankyou Sir May I have Another (16)
- Uncategorized (39)
- January 25, 2010: Only We Can Fix This
- January 20, 2010: Y2K Phase Two
- January 15, 2010: The Rest of the W-2 Story
- January 11, 2010: The Doctors Without Limits
- January 7, 2010: For Whom the Hard Drive Tolls
- December 23, 2009: Authonomy.com
- December 20, 2009: The Starvation Caused by Short Term Gains
- December 19, 2009: How to Get Rid of KDE Plasma Background Entries
- December 19, 2009: Thirty Two Seconds of IT Experience
- December 16, 2009: Will Target Put Amazon.com Out of Business?
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
Only We Can Fix This
January 25, 2010 by seasoned_geek.
I remember quite some time ago when there was an ad campaign which simply said “vote the crooks out of office”. Any money it raised went into running more ads. There were even T-shirts sold to fund the campaign. The campaign didn’t care what political party the candidate was in. Rather, it had a simply philosophy, every incumbent was obviously a career criminal which needed to be moved further away from the tax payer’s wallet.
Funny how things come back into style. I’m seeing a lot of the same campaign. Some say crook and others say criminal, but they have the same sentiment. We’ve all been royally screwed by both Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. No, I’m not talking about Clarence Thomas, who said “no job is worth this” during his confirmation hearings, then took the robe and voted in favor of his former client, Monsanto, during a genetics trial which screwed farmers world-wide, not just in America, and every American tax payer that eats. I’m talking about the recent decision by the Supreme Court which said the limits on corporate campaign dollars were unconstitutional. Any entity can now spend as much as they want promoting the candidate of their choice, so now, big corporations are simply going to put forth one of their own employees and spend shareholder’s money promoting the employee, who is expected to help enact legislation no ethical person would enact.
Today, we are all watching as the checkbooks are open and the sky is the limit when it comes to trampling down health care reform. I would believe the healthcare companies have actually spent more in lobbying efforts than they spent in executive bonuses and stock options over the past 4 years.
Let’s be real here. We have the Post Office. We also have UPS and FedEx. The Post Office couldn’t turn a profit on a bet given its charter, and I’m OK with that. Six days per week a mail carrier delivers mail to every address in the country. Anyone that currently is inside of our borders can write a letter, place it in an envelop, and mail said letter to any address in the continental U.S. for under a buck. Not only is the cost low, but the letter will arrive within 3-5 business days…even on Saturday…for no extra charge. We always joke about the Post Office delivering the Christmas mail in June, but for the most part, it’s a money losing business which does a good job. UPS and FedEx have found ways to both compete with and utilize the Post Office. Those who have money and don’t like the Post Office have other options. Those who don’t have much in the way of money, still have service. Even if you never mail a letter, the Post Office will continue to deliver mail to your address.
I’m a Republican, though it hurts to say that out loud after two terms of snot-nosed-George. I want a public option. We already have Gubmint Motors putting out shitty cars and other manufacturers putting out better ones. Yes, you “could” get by with a Gubmint Motors vehicle, but after the screwing they gave the tax payer, nobody who pays taxes would even consider adding insult to injury by purchasing a new Gubmint Motors vehicle. Admittedly, in the future, I’m sure Congress and/or the White House will authorize pissing even more tax dollars down that abyss and funding programs to get low income people new Gubmint Motors vehicles to help clean up the environment. Of course, since many states have a mandatory insurance law, that program will simply be there to help fill the prisons faster.
I didn’t want Gubmint Motors. I was vehemently against giving any faction of those lying-thieving-inept-bastards one red cent from the federal treasury. We ended up with Gubmint Motors. While they will cook the books in Aurthur Andersen accounting style to “show” a profit, they can never pay back enough to the treasury to cover the royal *(&)_(*&ing we got by them ducking out on their pension and healthcare liabilities. Until they cover all of that along with every cent we’ve had to pay every former GM employee in unemployment and health insurance benefits, they haven’t turned a profit. I want to see a law enacted which garnishes the wages of GM’s upper management and Board of Directors taking 70% of their wages and 100% of all bonus and stock options from them until they pay back every last red cent of that debt.
On the flip side, I want a public option. I want a government run health plan which provides all of the basic coverage needed by both individuals and families and I want every citizen to have the option of signing up without any exclusions. Rather than basing the premiums on the current industry trend, I want the premiums to be based upon a person’s ability to pay. At some point your income will be low enough your coverage is free. Those people making more than $180K/yr (based upon adjusted gross on their 1040) would find the premiums quite high compared to regular commercial plans. The Gubmint Insurance option would never make money, but it would force a nationwide ethical threshold for insurance.
Right now we have absolutely nothing establishing a bottom. Each state licenses the health insurance providers it allows to operate within its borders. Naturally, there have been an awful lot of bribes and some states only have one or two “licensed” providers. This really hit home recently.
A friend from NY asked me what I did for health insurance. I said I went to this eHealthInsurance.com Web site, answered some questions, and took a real 80/20 policy which costs less than $500 every two months. I told him there were dozens of providers selling insurance there. We are in the same age bracket and industry. In NY there were about three different companies providing insurance and the “cheap” policy was pricing out at $1700/month if you wanted anything other than a “surgery only” policy. Just for grins he changed his zipcode to mine and wa-la! There were about a dozen competing insurance companies and he found premiums of under $500.
Will Gibmint Insurance help me? Yes, but not as much as it will help him and everybody else in that boat. People in those markets will flock to Gubmint Insurance simply until the premiums in their area drop to an acceptable level. I expect there would be a shuffling of premium pricing in IL. Whenever book sales are high and I’m working a lot of overtime consulting, my current insurance would be best. When there is another slow down and the income stream drops to around $20K, Gubmint Insurance based on ability to pay would be best.
It’s up to us to fix this. The midterm elections are coming up. Not only must we vote the criminals out of office by making certain no incumbent returns, but we must replace said incumbent with any third party candidate vying for the seat. We went through this back in the days of Ross Perot. Before the dude went weird and dropped out of the election, America was set to elect its first third party candidate. No matter how awful of a president he turned out to be, he would have been better than what we ended up with. One thing happened though. During the debates and the interviews, the two main party candidates fell all over themselves to point out just how much like Ross they were.
I’m not normally very political, but this is pissing me off. It’s obvious the bill of sale has been completed by the healthcare industry for every public official in Washington at this time. It’s time we flood Washington with people from all of those “other” parties who’ve never held public office, never had a taste of lobbyist dollars, and never forced an earmark into a bill just to get some lobbyist project funded.
Vote the crooks out of office and send in the third party candidates. It is the only way to effect change at this point.
Posted in Thankyou Sir May I have Another | Print | No Comments »
Y2K Phase Two
January 20, 2010 by seasoned_geek.
Scammed this from a message in comp.os.vms
–2010 Date Recognition Problems
(January 5, 2010)
German payment cards are not the only technology to be hit with problems recognizing dates in the new year. (See story below.) Smartphone users running Windows Mobile are getting text messages dated 2016. Symantec’s Endpoint Protection manager is labeling signatures dated in the new year as being out-of-date; until the problem is addressed in an update, new malware signatures will be dated 12/31/2009 with increased revision numbers. Other vendors affected include Cisco, SpamAssassin.
ISC:
http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=7870
http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=7873
http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/The-year-2010-is-causing-I…
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/05/symantec_y2k10_bug/
Posted in Information Technology | Print | 1 Comment »
The Rest of the W-2 Story
January 15, 2010 by seasoned_geek.
Yesterday was quite entertaining. I spoke on the phone with a pimp late in the day about a contract at a former client site of mine. This pimp was obviously not a native and was subbing work through the industry bottom feeder, US Tech (they’ve actually managed to take the title away from EDS which should tell you just how low the firm is.)
The hilarious part of the conversation wasn’t hearing from the pimp, but rather hearing a voice which was obviously not from the midwest of the USA lament about how the off-shoring and influx of illegals had trashed billing rates and slaughtered the quality industry wide. He received hundreds of positions every day he didn’t bother to post or work because the billing rates were so low you could only get someone that would end up putting you in prison via the sponsorship clause. (For those who don’t understand that, some time around the time of the Patriot Act the rules changed for sponsorship. If you sign on the line for someone who is caught planning or committing an act of terror against the country or the people you get the same sentence they do. If they get the death sentence, you’ll be the very next person strapped into the chair on that very same day.)
I found it odd that someone, who obviously knew his company made money with these people, would be so dead set against even working the positions. At least I found it odd until we got around to discussing my working on a 1099 basis only. He hem-hawed around about really prefering W-2, but finally admitted they could work 1099. They just had to fill out a bunch of paperwork for their lawyers because of some recent problems.
Ah, the truth starts to leak. Why haven’t we heard it on the news? I guess, indirectly we did. There were some business announcement about tax collections being up this year without any explanation as to why. Now, the truth has slipped out. Plane load after plane load of IT and other “consultants” have been coming here for years on tourist visas which do not allow for income generating work to be done. Well, a few firms finally got caught. You see, the tourist workers just plucked a company name out of the air without getting an EIN (Employer Identification Number), because they couldn’t.
Well, somebody slipped up and tried to issue a W-9 to one of these people. The IRS came to visit. The IRS went to a judge and got all of their payroll records for the past N years. The IRS collected all of the taxes on every person they had issued a check to, even if that person had already paid the taxes. It was a pay us now and fight to get your money back later situation. When the IRS got done collecting taxes and issuing fines, they sent all of the information they had gathered over to the Department of Immigration and Naturalization. When INS showed up it wasn’t a free visit either. I didn’t hear it from him, but there were a few contracts which suddenly re-opened within a few days of the INS visit as the people working on-site had to leave.
You’ve heard me complain for years about the incestuous relationship these off-shore companies have. When one of them gets a contract, the automated subbing network is so large that they all have the contract and are all trying to take a $5/hr cut. Well, the IRS is currently “following the family love trail”. If you watch postings on DICE it is pretty entertaining. You can almost chart the progress of the IRS. Off-shore companies which always flagged things CON_IND are suddenly updating positions to flag them CON_W2 or FULL_TIME. You can pretty much chart the day the IRS arrived.
Since none of those people could legally work here, none of them paid taxes. When they got sick they went to the emergency room and the taxpayer, not the off-shore consulting company, picked up the tab. Well, the bill is coming due. Guido and Vic are making the rounds and suddenly IRS collections are way up for the year.
Posted in Information Technology | Print | No Comments »
The Doctors Without Limits
January 11, 2010 by seasoned_geek.
I must confess that I was deeply saddened to learn that David Tennant would not be continuing as “the doctor” in Doctor Who. As a young kid, I was never that into Doctor Who. When the new series came about, I must tell you that I was less than impressed with the actor they had playing “the Doctor”. I watched some of the episodes because the scripts were so well done, but I couldn’t call myself a fan.
Things changed dramatically when they brought in David Tennant. I had no idea who he was or that he was even in the Royal Shakespeare company, let alone that he played Hamlet for them. The first thing to change was my buying of the premise. David’s acting ability is such that he was on screen for less than a minute and already I was simply along for the ride.
A few episodes into the new doctor I noticed that the level of writing for the show was skyrocketing. The scripts kept going farther and pushing the actors and they kept rising to the challenge. I must admit that I only “liked” the Rose Tyler character. Perhaps because the “wholesome blonde from a bad part of town” angle of her character seemed a bit cliché, perhaps because it was a bit too obvious everyone was trying to push for a love story with that character.
Then the writers introduced Donna Noble. What a treasure of a character! The chemistry between her and the doctor was simply could not be written into a script. During the all of the finally specials you heard several times people saying that David Tennant was an actor without limits. While I agree with that statement whole heartedly, I think a good many of the people saying such things failed to notice that Doctor Donna kept in locked step with the Doctor throughout her existence in the series.
It’s a horrible thing to watch the end of such a magnificent pairing and an even more tragic thing to see a young and brilliant actor walk away from such a remarkable show. I understand being young and wanting to branch out into other things. I also understand wanting to go out on top, rather than riding a once loved series all the way to the bottom as so many have done before. Speaking as one who is long in the tooth, at some point in the not too distant future, the energy of youth will fade and one will look back fondly on this time wondering why they didn’t try to make it last just a little longer.
One must pity any actor who thinks they can fill the shoes of David Tennant or that they will be given a companion character like Donna Noble or an actor (actress) like Cathrine Tate to play the role. Speaking as a published author who has never written screen play, I have to ask, where do the writers go after having written for David and Cathrine for so long? Do you continue lunging forward setting up the replacement for a spectacular flame out in just a couple of episodes or do you pull back to the level of writing we saw with the first new Doctor when I wasn’t a fan?
I am going to miss the Doctors without limits. Their particular DVD set may find its way into my collection.
Posted in Information Technology | Print | No Comments »
For Whom the Hard Drive Tolls
January 7, 2010 by seasoned_geek.
I can’t read the following article without thinking they must have been hearing the opening bell from AC/DC’s “ Highway to Hell” throughout this entire demonstration.
MickeyWare has failed each and every time it has pushed a tablet onto the public. Bloated software and bad design cannot be compensated for by marketing. I’ve been there since the beginning. Early in my DOS days I was writing route auditing systems for Waste Management using the GridPad computer and proprietary pen based OS. Try as Tandy might, they couldn’t speed up the interface enough to compensate for the fact it had an 8086 running under it. Probably the worst thing they ever did was to allow for the display of graphics because management wanted every button to have a bitmap once they found that out. Adding insult to injury was the fact we had what amounted to EEPROM cards for both software and data storage. The combination of these two things made every screen paint horribly slow.
This isn’t the first time MickeyMouse Ware has tried to push a tablet on us. Anyone reading this old enough to remember when PenWindows came out? http://danbricklin.com/tabletcomputing.htm It is nice to see that not much has changed since that blog was written in 2002. What is more impressive is the fact we have seen nearly every computer manufacturer drop one of these turds onto the market and, without exception, they have all failed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tablet_computer Just take a look at the long list of convertible PCs at the end of that article. I’m not even certain the list is complete, but I remember the hype surrounding each one of those products as the plopped into the toilet of life.
The convertible was always the holy grail for hardware designers. In theory this allowed you to satisfy your existing notebook base while grabbing new sales territory. In reality, they simply polluted landfills faster. That flexy-twisty spot used some form of cable in every design and the cables always broke.
We shall see if Apple has figured it out. Microsoft is obviously a has been company given the joint announcement they had with HP about yet another market turd this week. They had to be rushing to have a conference in front of Apple just so they could try to make it sound like they didn’t attempt a cheap imitation of yet another Apple rip-off. Anyone remember Zune???
I’m willing to be Apple got it right. I’m willing to bet they ditched the “convertible” idea completely and simply provided extra USB and/or PS/2 ports on the side of a razor thin table. You see, today’s “gear kids” already go through keyboards like an older generation went through Boones Farm wine. Not only do they keep multiple keyboards laying around at the various places they tend to work (as do most business travellers today), but the younger crowd tends to carry these things in their backpack. http://www.thinkgeek.com/computing/input/5a7f/ I’ve seen them for under $20 in some mail order catalogs. I’ve tried typing on them in a few stores. Definitely not the easiest on the fingers, but you can get through a couple of meetings with them, no problem.
What was once considered an oddity is now considered common place, and that is the true norm of life. I’ve had a habit for years of rotating out keyboards every so many weeks or months, just to break up the monotony of typing. You see, I have to blame Chicony for this. Some time, not long after I bought my AST Premium 286 PC, I bought a Chicony KB-5181 clicky keyboard. That keyboard was the absolute best! It had the perfect spring and it was loud with its clicks. Most of today’s keyboards (even the cheap ones) don’t make any noise, or simply make a plastic rattle when you type fast on them. The 5181 had IBM PS/2 keyboard users telling me I needed a quieter keyboard. (You might still be able to find a PS/2 keyboard to get an idea just how loud the 5181 was.) I moved that keyboard from machine to machine to machine.
The problem was that the old keyboard used a big-DIN connector. I had various adapters to take it down to PS/2, but they all seemed to fail after a while. Finally, it became apparent that the keyboard driver chips on “modern” computers simply wouldn’t support a keyboard that still had an XT/AT switch on the bottom of it. (Yes children, there was a time when you couldn’t move a keyboard from one computer to another without tossing a well hidden DIP switch on the keyboard.)
After having gotten to the point in life where I had to toss that (and the other old big-DIN) keyboards out I had accumulated over the years, I got into the habit of picking up keyboards if I happened to see one for under $12 (usually $6) that seemed to type nice. I was doing my travelling consulting bit then, and the one thing you could always leave out of your gear to save space/weight was a keyboard for your notebook. Oddly enough, there always seemed to be room to bring the keyboard back. I haven’t quite figured that part out yet.
I suppose if I hadn’t gotten into the “cheap keyboard” phase and hadn’t been travelling to client sites I wouldn’t have gotten into the accumulate keyboard phase. I simply would have went out and dropped another $60-$80 on a keyboard I loved and moved it from machine to machine again. Of course, I take computers with me more now that I have a notebook instead of a singer sewing machine to lug around. Unless you are really old, you probably don’t have any concept of what a 38lb portable computer the size of a portable sewing machine looked like. I even had trouble finding a picture on-line. Mine weighed in at 38LBs because I had the 9” color VGA monitor and a whopping 40Meg hard drive with a dual 5.25 and 3.5” floppy drive. Those of us who needed to be able to add cards into our computers (like Digiboard 8 port serial cards or PIO-48 cards to control relays) had no choice. Eventually “ lunch box” computers came out. They weighed less, and as long as you didn’t need to put in a full length ISA card, you could get by with them. All of them had a built in drop down or tilt out keyboard that “could” be used to type on, but most of us also lugged around a keyboard we liked. A lot of vendors now sell “ rugged” versions of these lunch box computers pretty much for the same reason many of us carried a sewing machine.
Before I confuse the younger crowd too much, there were no batteries with either the luggable sewing machine sized or lunch box sized portable computers. You still had a big black standard power cord wadded up in that box which had to find an outlet. You didn’t even think about trying to use such a thing on the plane or a train. In many ways I miss my 486DX laptop from those days. I could use it on a train and running DOS with WordPerfect or a programming text editor it got over 6 hours of battery life…sigh
So, HP and Microsoft are proving once again that they don’t have the vision required to open a can of beer, and the rest of us are waiting for Apple to come out with a tablet that allows a user to hook up their own keyboard if they want it.
There will be a significant business niche for a tablet computer, just not a consumer niche. The GridPad, while ignored by most of the PC trade rags, sold many units to business customers. Developers wrote customized business applications for them, and despite the cost of the units, they were put into the field. Until you think about just how hard it was to keep paper auditing forms clean and legible from inside the cab of a garbage truck, you cannot begin to understand how much money was saved by spending some on the GridPad and the auditing software. The data went straight into the corporate systems once the auditor got back. It wasn’t real time, but it was close enough for then.
I have seen UPS and other delivery companies steer away from pen based and touch screen based computers in their vehicles. Both companies appear to spend quite a bit of money on developing custom hand held computers. Part of me things the government should force both companies into handing some of that technology over to the U.S. Post Office so they could be a little more up to date on the package delivery side. Despite all of the brew-ha-ha you hear during the health care debate, The high end shipping companies don’t seem to have a problem with the Post Office being there. I have physically seen most of them come into my local Post Office to drop off packages for people. It appears the higher end carriers have some kind of arrangement for when shipping is light or doesn’t require signature that they simply drop it off at the local post office for delivery. In other words, the high end shipping companies have found a way to make money using the post office. I suspect the health insurance companies will do the same, much the way we now have Medicare with high end companies providing “supplemental” insurance.
Ah well, sorry, I veered off course there.
At any rate, the TabletPC is not going to be a “ wow gotta have it” product for consumers, especially in a down economy…unless Apple has found a way to get their smart phone to be solid at its current size, but expand to a full tablet with 24” monitor on demand, I don’t see the Tablet being more than a profitable niche. Actually, for Microsoft and HP, it won’t even be that.
Posted in Information Technology | Print | No Comments »
Authonomy.com
December 23, 2009 by seasoned_geek.
While this blog entry might be considered self-serving (then again, what blog isn’t?) I need to tell you about an interesting Web site I found. It is interesting both for authors and for people who like the read. Those of you who cannot read probably aren’t reading this post anyway.
Harper Collins, one of the mega publishing houses with many imprints, has finally caved to the constant bitch-slapping it received about printing the same five books over and over again. They created a Web site which lets authors post some/all of their work for public review and comment. Book readers can communicate directly with the authors. If they like a book they can choose to “back” the book on the site. There is a convoluted formula to calculate ranking with. The site welcomes regular readers. Actually, it encourages the regular readers to join. It’s all free. Yes, the site has some technical problems, but those are mostly for authors trying to upload things.
What does HC get out of this? Well, periodically it takes the top N ranked books and forces their in-house editors to review them (along with the user feedback) for possible publishing contract. Of course, we have those who shouldn’t be writing out there trying to play ranking games to keep their book on the editor’s desk, but I could care less about that. I posted the promotional version of Infinite Exposure on the site mainly to get the feedback from readers. I’m not going to change anything in the book since I have it finalized for printing, but I will attempt to incorporate the comments into anything new I write.
http://www.authonomy.com/ViewBook.aspx?bookid=13804
So far the only major drawback I find with the site is that there is no manner of reading off-line. I don’t currently have a net-book (and until they get the battery life up to seven days instead of 70 minutes, I don’t want one). This means I have to read sitting at my desk, or lugging my laptop with power cable, into bed. This has become a regular occurrence for much of the business world it appears. Rather than fix the battery problem, the hard drive problem, and the software problem, a new product is created to make all of those problems more bearable.
http://www.brookstone.com/home-office-computer-accessories_e-pad-laptop-lap-desk.html?bkiid=categoryLandingPage_Home_Home_Office|C4CategoryProdList1FDT|6905345
Oh well. If you like being able to read books before they are published, and in many cases helping to shape their content or helping them to actually get published, you should check out http://www.authonomy.com.
Posted in Uncategorized | Print | No Comments »
The Starvation Caused by Short Term Gains
December 20, 2009 by seasoned_geek.
Those of us who see the destruction and devastation all around us find it difficult to condone what others pursue as “a good business practice.” We have heard for years about stock market players (in particular mutual fund and hedge fund managers) pursuing short term gains to juice their overall portfolio. We have watched corporations which were once the model for the world sell their future down the drain in order to make a fast buck this quarter (think GM and its pension plan.) Hell, we the tax payer, have had to bail most of them out this year, yet their executives still demand multi-million dollar compensation packages.
I guess I shouldn’t be surprised that it has finally hit agriculture in an end-of-the-industry way. I’ve watched it happening for the past couple of decades. I’m not talking about the huge corporate farms poisoning the world in order to make a fast buck. Eventually the excess population would be weeded off and the remaining people would simply quit buying stuff from supermarket chains. Perhaps China would claim jurisdiction over the corporate executives who poisoned so many. After all, in China they have public executions for people that poison consumable products.
What is happening now is a perfect storm which will leave the land unable to grow enough food and no trick of technology will help it. I’m not some alarmist tree hugger. I’m simply someone whose made a living over the past 20+ years being a problem solving analyst. I can find nothing which will solve this problem. But I can find historical evidence to back up my statements though.
The information is a bit hard to find on-line without buying DVDs, but the History Channel has run at least one show covering the Hanging Gardens of Babylon and how the continual irrigation to grow things in a desert lead to “salted earth.” You can even find textbooks covering the subject of irrigation failure. http://mygeologypage.ucdavis.edu/cowen/~GEL115/115CH17oldirrigation.html
Irrigation, however, is only a tiny portion of the problem. In fact, irrigation was the first warning sign we were headed down the path of short term gains destruction. Today, all the stops have been removed and we are running flat out towards world wide starvation, all for the sake of a fast buck.
As always, MBAs are at the root of this problem. After having trashed every industry they have touched, they moved into agriculture. First it was just the equipment manufacturers, then it was the packing plants, and then into livestock production. Since they couldn’t control enough that way, they bribed the politicians with lobbyist dollars to change the tax laws. Just about the only way to pass on a family farm to your heirs became the LLC-trust tool. If you didn’t use it, the government would take 75% of the estimated value of all assets in death taxes. The LLC-trust tool eventually puts all family farms under the control of a corporation, and guess who runs the corporations? Nice huh?
Most of you will have no idea this is going on. Most of you simply see the advertising on the product packaging showing a hard working family farmer, his picturesque little plot of land with a big red barn, and perhaps a small family. Wide open spaces, happy livestock, and a person who is one with the land. Subconsciously you buy into this because you want to believe it. The simple fact is, nothing could be further from the truth. Every year Willie Nelson and a bunch of others put on an event called Farm-Aid, but every year, fewer and fewer understand what is behind it. The simple truth is, they are trying to save the last few remaining family farms which actually live up to that picturesque marketing image. Most of them have “gone corporate” in some fashion. Sometimes they simply are forced into a contract to raise livestock in an un-healthy manner (watch the documentary Food, Inc. for some memorable images of this.) Other times the LLC-trusts they are forced to do business with force them into a raping of the land.
When the trusts first started out, they weren’t a purely evil thing like they are today. The entire focus and charter of the trust was the care and husbandry of the land. Back then the trust would partner with a farm family on a 50/50 or similar basis. Buildings and equipment on premises were maintained, and soil tests were regularly done on the land to ensure it was improving every year.
Today, the MBAs have put the industry in a death spiral. The entire focus is squeezing every risk free dollar possible out of this goose until it quits laying golden eggs. Massively high cash rents are requested, and bottom feeders pony up. There is no soil testing nor soil care plan. The bottom feeders over plant and provide the soil with no additional inputs. The soil is strip mined in the truest sense of the word, only this kind of strip mining doesn’t leave a gaping hole in the ground. You “see” this strip mining in the average yield movement or relative to fields around them.
Of course now, it is illegal for a realtor or anybody else to request the five year average yield report from the ASCS office. Only the owner can be given that. Why? Because once land has been had by a strip mine farming operation it is worthless. Nobody living locally will purchase it. The realtor has to sucker in an “investor” from far away promising the new owner the same continued high dollar cash rent which will pay for the land in no time. Most banks in or near a farming community will no longer issue a loan to anyone who says they expect the farming operation to pay for itself via cash rent. They’ve gone down that road before. Five years into the loan the land is ruined and absolutely worthless. The bank is left holding the bag in most cases. A bunch of money spent with lobbyists got the law changed so the buyer now has to take the realtor’s word for the yields when the current owner refuses to cough up the ASCS documentation.
I’ve been watching this happen a lot lately. In an effort to try and squeeze out every last nickel from the golden goose of LLC-trust land, the farm managers have ceased doing any and all maintenance on the property. They got the cash rent jacked up extra high because the farm came with on-site grain and equipment storage. A functioning grain dryer was also pointed out. Well, the grain bins have gone past their life expectancy and the dryer ceased functioning two years ago, but the rent hasn’t come down. The new trend now is to tell the tenant that they have to provide their own storage and drying facilities. The original farm family would roll over in their graves hearing this, but today it is considered “good business practice” by the MBAs and Farm Management Teams.
Perhaps it is easier for me to see living out in the farm area part time. I’ve watched one farm which, while not the best in the world, used to average 120-160 bushel per acre corn and 35-42 bushel per acre for soybeans. The farmer who had it died. Things changed hands a few times until it ended up in some kind of trust renting to a strip mine farming operation. The first few years they had the farm the auger cart made many trips across the fields hauling grain away from the combine. It was not uncommon to see the cart weighting for one of 4-6 semis to return from an elevator. Two years in, the auger cart was making far fewer trips and you got to see trucks waiting for hours to get filled. Just over a year ago I watched as the combine, the auger cart, and the first truck all left the bean field at the same time. Ah, but a big farming operation like that can play the insurance game filing claim after claim. The insurance companies don’t mandate inspections and proof of good farming practices. They simply cash the premium checks and hope for the best. In the mean time, everybody’s premiums go up around the country.
Once upon a time, these operations were an isolated case. Now they are common. In fact, the MBAs that run much of the Ag industry magazine business are starting to hold them up as shining examples of “best farmers” due to the size of their operations and the equipment leasing business they give the large equipment manufacturers.
What is overlooked in all of this is the fact the land cannot be magically healed once an operation like this is done with it. The land will have to lie fallow for three to five years getting treatments of manure and lime. That won’t get it back to healthy, but it will get it back to where some legitimate farming practices can begin to tend it.
The strip mining practice isn’t just an American problem. Most of the large operations have grabbed as many dollars as they can in this country and raced down to Brazil ( and a few other places) buying up cheap land and stripping it bare. The Ag magazines are always running stories about large farming operations which exist on multiple continents. Think about that. A farming operation existing on multiple continents. Obviously not that picturesque family farm you see on the packages in the supermarket, so how come they are legally allowed to use those images?
Posted in Thankyou Sir May I have Another | Print | No Comments »
How to Get Rid of KDE Plasma Background Entries
December 19, 2009 by seasoned_geek.
From time to time you will add various image files from somewhere on your system as background images. At some point in the future, you may want to understand how to get them out of that combo box list labeled “Picture:” below.
The poor man’s cheat is to simply rename the file from A.JPG to B.JPG and the entry will “appear” to be removed from the list. The truth is, the entry is still there, but only verifiable entries are displayed. The information which populates this particular combo box is squirreled away in the file plasma_disktop_appletsrc. Under Karmic Koala (9.10) KUbuntu it can be found under .kde/share/config. Please note that the leading “.” is actually part of the name and indicates a hidden directory. If you are going to search for this file from Dolphin you need to turn on the little checkbox which tells Dolphin to show hidden files.
Once you have opened the file in your favorite text editor, you need to search for userswallpapers. That is the variable which contains the full path and file name of every item which will show up in that combo box. Simply delete the entry or entries you wish to remove.
Posted in Information Technology | Print | No Comments »
Thirty Two Seconds of IT Experience
December 19, 2009 by seasoned_geek.
We all get these phone calls. Well, this week I got another one. Here’s how the phone call went:
Caller ID: (312)-646-7089
Caller: this is blah from blah-blah-blah. I see you have some Linux in your background and I’m looking for a good Linux person, do you have time to talk?
Me: I’m kind of busy now, but, what is it you are looking for?
Caller: Well I just wanted to spend a few minutes talking about your background and seeing if you were keeping yourself open for new opportunities.
Me: What is it you are looking for?
Caller: Well, as I stated, I’m looking for someone that is good with Linux and I saw you had some Linux in your background. Are you good with Linux?
Me: What do you mean by good?
Caller: You have a good day now. <click>
I expect these types of phone calls when it sounds like the person on the other end of the line has American English as their fourth or fifth language, not when the person sounds like they were born here. This guy obviously has about thirty two seconds of total IT experience and is trying to make a living with it. Anyone who actually understands the very first thing about IT knows just how absurd this guy sounds. They also know that this is the last person who should be recruiting geeks on the phone.
Since it appears that there are a lot of people working in HR for corporations, and as technical recruiters for consulting firms, let me add a few minutes to your education so you don’t sound like such a genetic misfit when you call a geek on the phone.
Linux is an Operating System. When it is actually running on a computer the combination of operating system and hardware are called a platform. “Good with Linux” is not a job title, it is a sub-requirement of an actual requirement. When you call up a geek and ask them if they are “good with Linux”, if they are even remotely qualified to fill the position you are trying to fill, they are going to ask you “what do you mean by good” or “what is it you’re looking for” or, they might choose to let you know just how far out your ass you are speaking by asking “what is it you are really looking for?”
Job Titles for geeks tend to include: Business Analyst, Technical Analyst, Technical Writer, Programmer, Programmer Analyst, Systems Analyst, Systems Administrator, Performance Analyst, Security Admin., etc. Each of these open requirements could have a sub-requirement of “good with Linux”, however, the definition of good is relevant to the skill set required for the actual job title. “Good with Linux” is a completely different set of skills when you are talking about a Programmer verses a Systems Analyst. A programmer needs to know about various tools, libraries, and languages for the development of software on the platform. The required set of tools + libraries + languages will be different for each and every shop looking for a programmer that is “good with Linux.” You cannot just drop a C++ Qt programmer into a Python Gtk shop.
Likewise, “good with Linux” has completely different definitions for Systems Administrators at a shop to shop level. It doesn’t matter if the “good with Linux” Systems Administrator you are talking with is a living god with the Tivoli tool set if the shop that put out the requirement doesn’t use Tivoli.
I didn’t publish the name of the person, or the company name, mainly because I didn’t bother to remember them. Caller ID helped out with the phone number though. Hopefully, the waste of oxygen who called me will read this, for it will exponentially increase their value in the universe.
I’m sure they eventually found someone that claimed to be “good with Linux.” I’m sure they presented that candidate with a glowing report. I’m also absolutely certain the time each client site manager spent reading that resume was nothing more than minutes of their life they will never get back.
Posted in Information Technology | Print | No Comments »
Will Target Put Amazon.com Out of Business?
December 16, 2009 by seasoned_geek.
I’ve actually been pondering this question for a while. I haven’t done any significant amount of numbers research, but it does look quite possible. I mean, Target should go after Amazon.com since Amazon has infringed on many of Target’s more profitable markets. Unlike most of the other brick and mortar chains in “blue collar to low end white collar” shopping world, Target has a reputation for having stores which are clean and bright and workers that actually feel a sense of pride about working there. Walmart, on the other hand, has states attempting to get legislation banning it from opening any more stores, not to mention documentaries put out about the horrors of the company, along with news stories about illegal alien cleaning crews…not going to be the type of chain anyone wants to see get bigger.
Kmart, what can one say about Kmart? For many of us, it was the place our parents had to shop. The chain was big in many areas which had been factory towns at a time when the factories were closing down due to jobs being sent overseas (sound familiar?) This was long before they had “Big K” and “Super Kmart” locations. It was a place you went for blue collar basic clothes, dress clothing which was mostly polyester, and cheap-enough-to-let-the-kids-play-with sporting goods supplies. Both JC Penny and Sears had better dress clothing, not good, but better. Along came a movie named “Rain Man” and Kmart became the definition of un-cool. It began to crumble financially, then somehow, Sears, a company which invented the catalog business then went bankrupt at it, had enough money to buy Kmart. Not too many weeks ago there was a story on the WBBM noon business wire about Sears being in financial trouble yet again. It’s kind of sad, because the addition of appliances and what could now actually be called a valid tool and automotive section has helped the larger Kmart locations at least look like they could be turning around.
In order to do something different, you have to have vision. It took a while for me to understand why Target got into the $9 hardcover book fight with Walmart. I’ve come to the conclusion that the retail analysts you hear interviewed on business radio and TV simply don’t have a clue. Target isn’t after Walmart because Walmart will implode on its own. There are too many lawsuits, too many news segments, too many documentaries, and too many governments passing “living wage” and “big box store” laws aimed directly at Walmart for Walmart to remain a viable company. Few companies in this world have a lower reputation for employee respect than Walmart. Quite simply, the days are numbered for that company. When the economy comes back all of the way Walmart will simply go away. It’s done the “dine and dive” on too many taxing bodies and retail site owners.
A visit to the Kmart web site doesn’t show any evidence that they have gotten into the $9 hardcover fight. I don’t expect they will. I firmly believe Walmart did it as some flash-in-the-pan marketing tactic, in part to take news cycles away from the Bruce Springsteen music CD backlash. Given Walmart’s reputation I cannot see a lot of independent author/publishers doing an exclusive deal with Walmart. They have a long history of shafting their vendors and you can even find articles about it in magazines like Kiplinger’s. A store with a good reputation, like Target, could make the entire thing work.
I’ve kind of covered the economics before, but you might not have understood. As an independent self-published author, I can get a 5.5 x 8.5 hard cover book with dust jacket of roughly 400 pages printed for around $4 per copy if and only if I have an ink print run of roughly 5,000 copies. Under the current author-publisher-distributor-bookstore model, I would front the entire print run for over eight months before I saw a dime from a book store. I would also be paying a lot of shipping charges for returns from chain store locations. The $20K for the print run would have an additional $8-12K in marketing expenses along with $2-4K in shipping. I would be financing that one way or another for at least eight months before I received payments from the book stores which may or may not cover the cost of the print run, let alone the other expenses. The list price on that book would be $24. The distributor would take a 55% discount which would mean $10.80 per copy (less withholding for potential future returns) would get sent to me. Anywhere from 5%-20% of that print run is going to come back “damaged” if it was stocked in an actual retail store. Trust me.
At the end of eight months on store shelves approximately 4,000 copies would be in sellable condition, the rest would have to be given away or pulped. So, I would take up to $36K out of pocket for eight months in the hopes of receiving $43K back and netting a whopping $7K. For the sake of argument, we will assume I had the cash on-hand and wasn’t financing part of this on a credit card at 20%. Publishers want a “run-away-best-seller” not just so they can make a fast buck, but because they want less than 5% coming back as returns.
Let us take a look at the $9 hardcover market. I still have the printing costs, but there are no returns. There is a one time freight shipping cost of less than $1000 to ship to a Target (or other chain) distribution center. Terms are net-30 or net-45 depending upon how negotiations went. I sell the books for $6/copy and get paid for all of them. $30K - $21K = $9K in under two months. Granted, I would be doing a lot less marketing. I would probably be willing to spend about $2K (what most major publishers actually spend marketing a new book by a new author) on getting reviews done, but the rest of the marketing would be up to the retail chain which has its own massive Web site and is creating sale flyers every week.
The downside for Target is they would have to hire 5-10 “readers” at the corporate level. These people would have to actually read at least a few chapters of every submitted book and decide what to stock on the shelves. I believe currently much of the stocking requirements are driven by automated reporting from book sales rating services much like the recording industry has/had for record sales.
Of course, Target (or the chain store that does it) could take it one final step. They could strike right where Amazon lives. The country has many printing firms which use actual ink and specialize in book print runs of less than 50,000. If target had the readers making choices, and the self-publishers had everything ready to go, Target could simply sign a contract with the self-publisher, pay $2.25/copy to the self-publisher for every copy they print, and contract directly with a printing house. They would probably need to contract with one near each distribution center, get them unified in equipment, and split the print runs across each location to minimize shipping costs. You know Target (or the chain which does this) is going to get a much better price than the self-publisher for printing. The printing will be done with actual ink so it won’t be a tacky and disgusting POD book like many being sold on Amazon today.
In truth, once Target finishes heading down this path, I see Kmart/Sears following suit. Anyone who has shopped those two chains knows that they are both used to having exclusive slices of overlapping markets. For those of you who don’t have to do your own shopping, let me spell it out: If I want Irish Spring scented Speed Stick, I have to get it at Kmart. The powered or talc scented stuff I have to get at Target, or the other way around. Both chains carry the product line, but each store appears to have certain scents you can only get there. As consumers, we are used to having to make more than one stop to get everything we need.
There are certainly more than enough self-publishers out there for both Kmart and Target to have a couple thousand titles which are only available in print form at their store. The really bad stories would be relegated to using POD and being sold on Amazon. The ground breaking works of fiction would most likely still sell via the traditional channels since there would be a much higher rate of return. Of course, we are only talking about general fiction and young adult book types here. Reference, research, professional, etc. would all still do best going through regular channels, since the margins are usually higher on those, I don’t see that changing. Fiction, however, is quickly becoming a commodity.
Oddly enough, the timing is just about right for Target/Kmart to make a play into the general reading market. There are a lot of print shops that would drool to get the business, and eBooks are poised to take the bottom end of the market out. The paperback novel is quickly heading the way of the buggy whip. Quite simply $9 hard cover and $4 or less ebook pricing will vaporize the $4 paperback market. (Out of politeness, I won’t say what it will do to the $10+ paperback market.)
One or both chains should have no trouble adding ebook sales to their Web site. I just received an announcement from what used to be ShortCovers. They have changed their name to Kobo and spun off from their parent company. I found this paragraph interesting in the announcement:
Through its new strategic partners, Kobo has distribution in the U.S., Canada, UK, European Union, Australia, New Zealand, Hong Kong and other territories. Core to Kobo’s strategy is making eReading available through partners everywhere and as such, the company will be working to enable a broad range of retailers, device manufacturers, and operators who will benefit from our leading eReading service.
I don’t know what all of the ins and outs are with the deal. I do know that Borders is one of the investors, which struck me as odd given the above paragraph. Perhaps they have come to the conclusion that it’s better to take a small cut than try to lock the market? I don’t know. It definitely sounds like the new company is looking to add more retailers and views itself more as a bundled service they could offer than a competitor.
I do know that Amazon has had a ToolCrib site selling tools to customers. I also know they have some other site selling housewares since I was searching for a wall lamp on-line and that store came up. Everybody knows they have been into books, movies, and video games for a while. I haven’t dug to find what else they sell, but when they branched out to compete with other retailers in traditional markets, they basically offered up the challenge for those retailers to venture into Amazon’s market.
The real question I have right now is: Will Barnes & Noble create their own on-line video rental business to compete with Block Buster and Netflix, or will Target do that too? You see, most of us already have to go to Target and Kmart to buy things like pit stick, socks, and undies. We could drop off our rentals while picking other things up. There would only be outbound shipping charges for the rental service. These chains have a lot of 24hr locations now. For people like me in the boonies, returns might not be so easy, but being able to drop them off and midnight and know they were scanned into the system at the same time would be nice. I would think it would reduce the number of damaged DVDs as well.
Barnes & Noble has a different problem if they want to go into the rental business. The “drop off” feature won’t have the 24hr benefits. I would hazard a guess they would move towards more of the traditional video rental business, not because it would make money directly, but because it would keep customers in their stores longer. BN doesn’t stock milk, eggs, and undies. Not a lot of people read books today. Most people who buy movies from a retail store (instead of on-line) tend to buy them from a store they are already in.
Ah well. It will be interesting to see if Target takes the gloves off and tries to drive a stake through the heart of Amazon in 2010. The chain certainly has the financial muscle and marketing savy to take them out, especially if Kmart follows suit. Of course, the natural extension of exclusive titles is for each chain to have its own book club.
Posted in Uncategorized | Print | No Comments »